docs(readme): refresh local parser benchmark results (#192)
* docs(readme): refresh parser benchmark results * docs(readme): include stored parser results * docs(readme): refresh remaining parser results * docs: sync benchmark references
This commit is contained in:
@@ -28,17 +28,17 @@ Evaluated on the [opendataloader-bench](https://github.com/opendataloader-projec
|
||||
|
||||
| Engine | Overall | Reading Order (NID) | Tables (TEDS) | Headings (MHS) | Speed (200 docs) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| pdf-inspector | **0.875** | **0.915** | **0.814** | 0.788 | **2.8s** |
|
||||
| liteparse | 0.870 | 0.908 | 0.693 | **0.811** | 13.9s |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.843 | 0.912 | 0.489 | 0.760 | 9.8s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.735 | 0.886 | 0.401 | 0.424 | 15.5s |
|
||||
| markitdown | 0.583 | 0.879 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 6.7s |
|
||||
| pdf-inspector | **0.875** | **0.915** | **0.814** | 0.788 | **0.470s** |
|
||||
| liteparse | 0.873 | 0.913 | 0.693 | **0.811** | 0.750s |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.831 | 0.902 | 0.489 | 0.739 | 2.569s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.735 | 0.886 | 0.401 | 0.424 | 17.117s |
|
||||
| markitdown | 0.589 | 0.844 | 0.273 | 0.000 | 16.165s |
|
||||
|
||||
Results were refreshed on July 16, 2026, on an Apple M4 Pro. Engine versions were pdf-inspector 0.1.6, LiteParse 2.6.0, OpenDataLoader 2.1.1, PyMuPDF4LLM 0.2.0, and MarkItDown 0.1.4. Speed is the median of three complete corpus runs.
|
||||
Results were refreshed on July 31, 2026, on an Apple M4 Pro. Engine versions were pdf-inspector 0.2.6, LiteParse 2.10.1, OpenDataLoader 2.2.1, PyMuPDF4LLM 0.2.0, and MarkItDown 0.1.5. Speed is the median of five alternating or rotating complete corpus runs after an excluded warm-up run, with each parser processing documents sequentially in a single process.
|
||||
|
||||
For context, engines that use OCR or model-based document parsing (docling, marker, mineru) score 0.83-0.88 overall but take 2-180 minutes on the same corpus — pdf-inspector reaches the top of that range without either, in 2.8 seconds.
|
||||
The complete parser configuration, per-document predictions, evaluator output, and generated charts are available in the [reproducible results branch](https://github.com/firecrawl/opendataloader-bench/tree/abi/pdf-parser-benchmark-results).
|
||||
|
||||
**Best fit:** Native-text PDFs where speed, reading order, and table structure matter. pdf-inspector delivered the highest overall, reading-order, and table scores, along with the fastest complete run in this benchmark. That makes it a strong local default for reports, research papers, financial documents, invoices, and legal PDFs that need clean, structured Markdown without adding OCR latency or infrastructure.
|
||||
**Best fit:** Native-text PDFs where speed, reading order, and table structure matter. In this comparison, pdf-inspector delivered the higher overall, reading-order, and table scores, along with the fastest complete run. That makes it a strong local default for reports, research papers, financial documents, invoices, and legal PDFs that need clean, structured Markdown without adding OCR latency or infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
Use the [paired benchmark harness](docs/benchmarking.md) to compare two local builds against the exact same corpus and evaluator revision.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user