Compare commits
10
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
ca7994d686 | ||
|
|
16df5fcf07 | ||
|
|
14fb1a9296 | ||
|
|
dcb143eee3 | ||
|
|
d2b9b6559a | ||
|
|
5262c5fb6a | ||
|
|
06724435a0 | ||
|
|
d17bba0780 | ||
|
|
9fc674c127 | ||
|
|
a910b7df1d |
@@ -23,20 +23,21 @@ Built by [Firecrawl](https://firecrawl.dev) to handle text-based PDFs locally in
|
||||
|
||||
## Benchmark
|
||||
|
||||
Evaluated on the [opendataloader-bench](https://github.com/opendataloader-project/opendataloader-bench) corpus (200 PDFs). Only direct text extraction engines are shown — no OCR, no ML models. Scores are 0-1, higher is better.
|
||||
Evaluated on the [opendataloader-bench](https://github.com/opendataloader-project/opendataloader-bench) corpus (200 PDFs). Only local engines without model-based PDF parsing are shown; OCR was disabled. Scores are 0-1, higher is better.
|
||||
|
||||
| Engine | Overall | Reading Order (NID) | Tables (TEDS) | Headings (MHS) | Speed (200 docs) |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| pdf-inspector | **0.875** | **0.915** | **0.814** | 0.788 | 3.3s |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.831 | 0.902 | 0.489 | 0.739 | 3.0s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 18s |
|
||||
| markitdown | 0.59 | 0.84 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 23s |
|
||||
| pdf-inspector | **0.875** | **0.915** | **0.814** | 0.788 | **2.8s** |
|
||||
| liteparse | 0.870 | 0.908 | 0.693 | **0.811** | 13.9s |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.843 | 0.912 | 0.489 | 0.760 | 9.8s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.735 | 0.886 | 0.401 | 0.424 | 15.5s |
|
||||
| markitdown | 0.583 | 0.879 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 6.7s |
|
||||
|
||||
For context, engines that use OCR/ML (docling, marker, mineru) score 0.83-0.88 overall but take 2-180 minutes on the same corpus — pdf-inspector reaches the top of that range without any OCR, in 3.3 seconds.
|
||||
Results were refreshed on July 16, 2026, on an Apple M4 Pro. Engine versions were pdf-inspector 0.1.6, LiteParse 2.6.0, OpenDataLoader 2.1.1, PyMuPDF4LLM 0.2.0, and MarkItDown 0.1.4. Speed is the median of three complete corpus runs.
|
||||
|
||||
**Where we do well:** The best overall, reading-order, and table scores among the direct extraction engines shown.
|
||||
For context, engines that use OCR or model-based document parsing (docling, marker, mineru) score 0.83-0.88 overall but take 2-180 minutes on the same corpus — pdf-inspector reaches the top of that range without either, in 2.8 seconds.
|
||||
|
||||
**Where we lag:** Some direct engines remain slightly faster, and OCR-based engines can recover text that has no usable PDF text layer.
|
||||
**Best fit:** Native-text PDFs where speed, reading order, and table structure matter. pdf-inspector delivered the highest overall, reading-order, and table scores, along with the fastest complete run in this benchmark. That makes it a strong local default for reports, research papers, financial documents, invoices, and legal PDFs that need clean, structured Markdown without adding OCR latency or infrastructure.
|
||||
|
||||
Use the [paired benchmark harness](docs/benchmarking.md) to compare two local builds against the exact same corpus and evaluator revision.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ The OpenDataLoader repository is external and keeps its normal
|
||||
temporary directory before evaluating it, so the baseline and candidate cannot
|
||||
overwrite one another.
|
||||
|
||||
## Published comparison protocol
|
||||
|
||||
The public benchmark table was refreshed on July 16, 2026, on an Apple M4 Pro
|
||||
using pdf-inspector 0.1.6, LiteParse 2.6.0, OpenDataLoader 2.1.1,
|
||||
PyMuPDF4LLM 0.2.0, and MarkItDown 0.1.4. Every engine processed the same 200
|
||||
PDFs with OCR disabled. Reported speed is the median of three complete corpus
|
||||
runs; quality scores come from the benchmark evaluator over all 200 outputs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Optional backend evidence probe
|
||||
|
||||
The evidence probe compares positioned `pdf2md` items with MuPDF structured
|
||||
|
||||
+7
-5
@@ -14,15 +14,17 @@ Built by [Firecrawl](https://firecrawl.dev) to handle text-based PDFs locally in
|
||||
|
||||
## Benchmark
|
||||
|
||||
[opendataloader-bench](https://github.com/opendataloader-project/opendataloader-bench) corpus (200 PDFs), direct-extraction engines only — no OCR, no ML. Scores 0–1, higher is better:
|
||||
[opendataloader-bench](https://github.com/opendataloader-project/opendataloader-bench) corpus (200 PDFs), local engines without model-based PDF parsing; OCR disabled. Scores 0–1, higher is better:
|
||||
|
||||
| Engine | Overall | Reading order | Tables (TEDS) | Headings | Speed |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **pdf-inspector** | **0.875** | **0.915** | **0.814** | 0.788 | 3.3s |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.831 | 0.902 | 0.489 | 0.739 | 3.0s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 18s |
|
||||
| **pdf-inspector** | **0.875** | **0.915** | **0.814** | 0.788 | **2.8s** |
|
||||
| liteparse | 0.870 | 0.908 | 0.693 | **0.811** | 13.9s |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.843 | 0.912 | 0.489 | 0.760 | 9.8s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.735 | 0.886 | 0.401 | 0.424 | 15.5s |
|
||||
| markitdown | 0.583 | 0.879 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 6.7s |
|
||||
|
||||
OCR/ML engines (docling, marker, mineru) score 0.83–0.88 overall but take 2–180 minutes on the same corpus. Full numbers in the [repo README](https://github.com/firecrawl/pdf-inspector#benchmark).
|
||||
Refreshed July 16, 2026, on Apple M4 Pro; speed is the median of three complete corpus runs. Full methodology and versions are in the [repo README](https://github.com/firecrawl/pdf-inspector#benchmark).
|
||||
|
||||
## Install
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+7
-5
@@ -14,15 +14,17 @@ Built by [Firecrawl](https://firecrawl.dev) to handle text-based PDFs locally in
|
||||
|
||||
## Benchmark
|
||||
|
||||
[opendataloader-bench](https://github.com/opendataloader-project/opendataloader-bench) corpus (200 PDFs), direct-extraction engines only — no OCR, no ML. Scores 0–1, higher is better:
|
||||
[opendataloader-bench](https://github.com/opendataloader-project/opendataloader-bench) corpus (200 PDFs), local engines without model-based PDF parsing; OCR disabled. Scores 0–1, higher is better:
|
||||
|
||||
| Engine | Overall | Reading order | Tables (TEDS) | Headings | Speed |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **pdf-inspector** | **0.875** | **0.915** | **0.814** | 0.788 | 3.3s |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.831 | 0.902 | 0.489 | 0.739 | 3.0s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 18s |
|
||||
| **pdf-inspector** | **0.875** | **0.915** | **0.814** | 0.788 | **2.8s** |
|
||||
| liteparse | 0.870 | 0.908 | 0.693 | **0.811** | 13.9s |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.843 | 0.912 | 0.489 | 0.760 | 9.8s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.735 | 0.886 | 0.401 | 0.424 | 15.5s |
|
||||
| markitdown | 0.583 | 0.879 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 6.7s |
|
||||
|
||||
OCR/ML engines (docling, marker, mineru) score 0.83–0.88 overall but take 2–180 minutes on the same corpus. Full numbers in the [repo README](https://github.com/firecrawl/pdf-inspector#benchmark).
|
||||
Refreshed July 16, 2026, on Apple M4 Pro; speed is the median of three complete corpus runs. Full methodology and versions are in the [repo README](https://github.com/firecrawl/pdf-inspector#benchmark).
|
||||
|
||||
## Install
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+7
-5
@@ -14,15 +14,17 @@ Built by [Firecrawl](https://firecrawl.dev) for hybrid OCR pipelines — extract
|
||||
|
||||
## Benchmark
|
||||
|
||||
[opendataloader-bench](https://github.com/opendataloader-project/opendataloader-bench) corpus (200 PDFs), direct-extraction engines only — no OCR, no ML. Scores 0–1, higher is better:
|
||||
[opendataloader-bench](https://github.com/opendataloader-project/opendataloader-bench) corpus (200 PDFs), local engines without model-based PDF parsing; OCR disabled. Scores 0–1, higher is better:
|
||||
|
||||
| Engine | Overall | Reading order | Tables (TEDS) | Headings | Speed |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| **pdf-inspector** | 0.83 | 0.88 | **0.66** | 0.74 | **4s** |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.49 | 0.74 | 11s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.73 | 0.89 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 18s |
|
||||
| **pdf-inspector** | **0.875** | **0.915** | **0.814** | 0.788 | **2.8s** |
|
||||
| liteparse | 0.870 | 0.908 | 0.693 | **0.811** | 13.9s |
|
||||
| opendataloader | 0.843 | 0.912 | 0.489 | 0.760 | 9.8s |
|
||||
| pymupdf4llm | 0.735 | 0.886 | 0.401 | 0.424 | 15.5s |
|
||||
| markitdown | 0.583 | 0.879 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 6.7s |
|
||||
|
||||
OCR/ML engines (docling, marker, mineru) score 0.83–0.88 overall but take 2–180 minutes on the same corpus. Full numbers in the [repo README](https://github.com/firecrawl/pdf-inspector#benchmark).
|
||||
Refreshed July 16, 2026, on Apple M4 Pro; speed is the median of three complete corpus runs. Full methodology and versions are in the [repo README](https://github.com/firecrawl/pdf-inspector#benchmark).
|
||||
|
||||
## Install
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
+677
-358
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
Reference in New Issue
Block a user